User Tools

Site Tools


mantisbt:custom_field_display_requirements

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
mantisbt:custom_field_display_requirements [2007/08/07 14:28]
roleary
mantisbt:custom_field_display_requirements [2008/10/29 04:25] (current)
Line 38: Line 38:
  
 Not sure if this is correct, but in the MantisConnect API code, the new field that stores the display value as a serialized array returns it as such. So you'd get something like: "a:10:{i:10;i:2;i:20;i:1;i:30;i:2;i:40;i:2;i:50;i:1;i:60;i:1;i:70;i:2;i:71;i:2;i:72;i:0;i:73;i:0;}" Not sure if this is correct, but in the MantisConnect API code, the new field that stores the display value as a serialized array returns it as such. So you'd get something like: "a:10:{i:10;i:2;i:20;i:1;i:30;i:2;i:40;i:2;i:50;i:1;i:60;i:1;i:70;i:2;i:71;i:2;i:72;i:0;i:73;i:0;}"
 +
  
  
Line 43: Line 44:
  
 thraxisp - What happened to the 'Advanced' setting? This controlled fields that were displayed on the Advanced pages.  thraxisp - What happened to the 'Advanced' setting? This controlled fields that were displayed on the Advanced pages. 
-    roleary - The Advanced setting is still available (it's above the screenshot that I attached). However, I believe that "paulr" has taken my patch and is modifying it, and that the Advanced setting is something he's changing. Part of this is because it obviously doesn't make sense to have a field 'Required' and 'Display only on Advanced'. When he finishes his update, I'll change this page.+  * roleary - The Advanced setting is still available (it's above the screenshot that I attached). However, I believe that "paulr" has taken my patch and is modifying it, and that the Advanced setting is something he's changing. Part of this is because it obviously doesn't make sense to have a field 'Required' and 'Display only on Advanced'. When he finishes his update, I'll change this page. 
 +----
  
 thraxisp - I assume that the visibility by access level is retained. That is, viewer can't see fields with the read parameter set to a higher level. thraxisp - I assume that the visibility by access level is retained. That is, viewer can't see fields with the read parameter set to a higher level.
-    roleary - The visibility of fields is retained. Again, this could lead to a business rule issue where a field is not visible, but has been marked as 'Required'. In that case, it actually wouldn't get checked because it wouldn't have been displayed... I think. This issue will probably also be resolved by paulr's changes.+  * roleary - The visibility of fields is retained. Again, this could lead to a business rule issue where a field is not visible, but has been marked as 'Required'. In that case, it actually wouldn't get checked because it wouldn't have been displayed... I think. This issue will probably also be resolved by paulr's changes. 
 +----
  
  
 Please add your comments and feedback in this section. Please add your comments and feedback in this section.
mantisbt/custom_field_display_requirements.1186511321.txt.gz · Last modified: 2008/10/29 04:31 (external edit)